next up previous
Next: Plateau de Bure as Up: IRAM Newsletter 54 (December 2002) Previous: Personnel Changes

Subsections

IRAM Program Committee Recommendations

The IRAM program committee convened in Grenoble on October 17 and 18 to discuss the proposals submitted for the winter 2002/2003 scheduling period. The committee was chaired by Linda Tacconi (MPE, Munich). The principal investigators of each proposal will also be informed by letter which will include comments issued by the committee if there are any.

Plateau de Bure Interferometer Proposals

A total of 76 proposals were received for the interferometer. The programs were classified A (accepted), B (backup) and C (rejected). Programs rated A will be scheduled in priority. Further time, if it becomes available, will go to the B programs, taking into account scientific merit, crowding in certain right ascension ranges and general aspects of balance.

For projects rated A and B and without IRAM internal collaborator, please consult the list of local contacts on the IRAM web pages http://www.iram.fr/GENERAL/loc_sep02.txt.


PdBI Proposal Ratings
Project Rate Project Rate Project Rate
M022 A1 M023 C M024 C
M025 B M026 B M027 A
M028 A2 M029 B2 M02A B
M02B B M02C B M02D B
M02E B M02F C M030 A3
M031 A M032 A M033 B
M034 A M035 B2 M036 B2
M037 C M038 A M039 A
M03A C M03B C M03C C
M03D C M03E B M03F B2
M040 A1 M041 B2 M042 A
M043 B M044 A M045 C
M046 A M047 A M048 C
M049 B M04A C M04B B
M04C B M04D B M04E B
M04F B M050 B2 M051 B2
M052 C M053 C M054 B
M055 A M056 A M057 B
M058 B2 M059 C M05A C
M05B B2 M05C B M05D A
M05E B2 M05F A M060 A
M061 A M062 B M063 B
M064 A M065 B M066 B2
M067 B M068 B M069 B
M06A B2 M06B B2 M06C B
M06D C        
 
1 program rated B and C in one or more parts
2 program rated B in one or more parts
3 program rated C in one or more parts

30m Proposals

105 proposals were received for the 30m telescope, requesting 4426.5 hours of telescope time. The highest rating ``A'' was given to 26 proposals; 55 proposals were rated ``B'', i.e. were given backup status. The remaining proposals, although scientifically valuable in most cases, were rated ``C''. The individual ratings are listed in the attached table. All A-rated proposals will be scheduled on the telescope, although some with less time than requested. We expect that about half of the B-rated programs will actually be scheduled. The selection will take into account scientific merit, crowding in certain right ascension ranges, and general aspects of balance. Proposals rated "C'' will not get telescope time.


30-M Proposal Ratings
A B C
086-02 087-02 135-02 093-02
088-02* 088-02* 136-02 094-02
095-02 089-02 138-02 097-02
102-02 090-02 139-02 099-02
103-02 091-02 140-02 104-02
107-02 092-02 141-02 105-02
109-02 096-02 145-02 108-02
114-02 098-02 147-02 112-02
118-02* 100-02 153-02 113-02
121-02 101-02 158-02 144-02
126-02 106-02 162-02 146-02
131-02 110-02 163-02 150-02
134-02 111-02 165-02 152-02
137-02 115-02 166-02 154-02
142-02 116-02 167-02 155-02
143-02 117-02 170-02 156-02
148-02 118-02* 173-02 157-02
149-02 119-02 174-02 169-02
151-02 120-02 175-02 171-02
159-02 122-02 178-02 176-02
160-02 123-02 180-02 177-02
161-02 124-02 181-02 179-02
164-02 125-02 182-02 184-02
168-02 127-02 183-02 189-02
172-02 128-02 185-02  
188-02 129-02 186-02  
  130-02 187-02  
  132-02 190-02  
  133-02    
 
* part of proposal



Roberto NERI and Clemens THUM


next up previous
Next: Plateau de Bure as Up: IRAM Newsletter 54 (December 2002) Previous: Personnel Changes
bremer@iram.fr