Call for Observing Proposals for the Plateau de Bure Interferometer

Conditions for the next winter session

Despite the fact that we still rely on ground transport and transport by helicopter, we are confident that we can support at least three configuration changes this winter. We therefore ask investigators to submit proposals for all four of the primary configurations of the six antenna array. The D, C and B configurations have already been scheduled last winter. With the A configuration, the Plateau de Bure Interferometer will offer anew the possibility to carry out high resolution observations. The A configuration provides an angular resolution of 0.6'' at 230 GHz for targets at $\ge 30^\circ$declination.

A preliminary configuration schedule for the winter period is outlined below. Please note that the more compact configurations (C and D) will be available only at the end of January at the earliest. The scheduling priority will later be adapted according to pressure in right ascension ranges and may further be changed during the winter period depending on weather conditions. The configuration schedule should be taken as a guideline, in particular when astronomical targets are requested that cannot be observed during the entire winter period (45$^\circ$ sun avoidance circle).

Conf	Scheduling Priority Winter 2002/2003
B	November - December
A	December - January
C	February - March
D	March - April

When the atmospheric conditions are not good enough at 1.3mm, 3mm projects will be observed: last winter, 20-30% of the time was found to be poor at 1.3mm, but was excellent at 3mm. We therefore invite proposers to submit a significant number of proposals also for observations at 3mm.

Finally, we would like to draw attention to the fact that we have started discussions with the CDS about the publication of summary tables with detailed information on PdB proposals. As a further step to making the interferometer results available as widely as possible, we are discussing the introduction of proprietory periods for which the data will be protected before becoming available in an archive.

Call for Proposals

Under normal operating conditions, IRAM schedules and completes between 40 to 60 projects during the winter period, with an elapsed time of at least two months between start and end of any given project. Selection is based on scientific merit, technical feasibility, and adequacy to the instrument.

Details of the PdBI and the observing procedures are given in the document ``An Introduction to the IRAM Plateau de Bure Interferometer''. A copy can be obtained from the address below or from the World-Wide-Web at http://iram.fr/PDBI/bure.html). Proposers should read this document carefully before submitting any proposal.

Proposal templates "proposal.tex" as well as the Latex style file "proposal.sty" are available by anonymous ftp from iram.fr (in the directory dist/proposal), or from the Internet via the Web at http://iram.fr/proposal/proposal.html. In case of problems, contact the scientific secretary, Mrs Cathy Berjaud (berjaud@iram.fr).

Do not use characters smaller than 11pt, which could make your proposal illegible when duplicated or faxed. For the same reasons, also avoid sending figures with grey scale maps by fax. In case your proposal reaches us in time, but is incomplete or unreadable when copied, we will try our best to contact you. The Principal Investigator will receive by return mail an acknowledgement of receipt and the proposal number.

The scientific aims of the proposed programme should be explained in 2 pages of text maximum, plus up to two pages of figures, tables, and references. Proposals should be self-explanatory, clearly state their aims, and explain the need of the Plateau de Bure interferometer.

In all cases, indicate on the first page whether your proposal is (or is not) the resubmission of a previously rejected proposal or the continuation of either a 30m telescope or PdBI proposal. In case of a resubmission, state very briefly in the introduction why the proposal is being resubmitted (e.g. improved scientific justification, observational restrictions).

For this call for proposals, please note the following details.

Proposal category

Proposals should be submitted for one of the five categories:

dual freq.:

Proposals that ask simultaneously for observations at 3mm and 1.3mm.

1.3mm:

Proposals that ask for 1.3mm data only. 3mm receivers will be used for pointing and calibration purposes, but the scientific goals of the proposal rely on the 1.3mm receivers.

3mm:

Proposals that ask for 3mm data only. 1.3 mm receivers can still be used to provide either phase stability information or purely qualitative information such as the mere existence of fringes.

time filler:

Proposals that have to be considered as background projects to fill in periods where the atmospheric conditions do not allow mapping, or eventually, to fill in gaps in the scheduling, or periods when only a subset of the standard configurations will be available. These proposals will be carried out on a ``best effort'' basis only.

special:

Exploratory proposals: proposals whose scientific interest justifies the attempt to use the PdB array beyond its guaranteed capabilities. This category includes for example non-standard frequencies for which the tuning cannot be guaranteed, and more generally all non-standard observations. These proposals will be carried out on a ``best effort'' basis only.

The proposal category will have to be specified on the proposal cover sheet and should be carefully considered by proposers.

New configurations for six antennas

New configurations are now available that take full advantage of the sixth antenna.

The six antennas can now be arranged in four primary configurations, instead of the six for the 5-antenna array (the 5-antenna array configurations will still be used during the summer antenna maintenance). The configurations for the winter period will be:

Conf	Stations
D	W05	W00	E03	N05	N09	N13
C	W12	E10	E16	N02	N09	N20
B	W12	E04	E23	N07	N17	N29
A	W27	W23	E16	E23	N13	N29

• D alone is best suited for deep integration and coarse mapping experiments. This configuration provides both the highest sensitivity and the lowest atmospheric phase noise. It is slightly more extended than the 5-element D configuration: the beam is smaller, but slightly more elliptical.
• C provides a fairly complete coverage of the uv-plane (low sidelobe level) and is well adapted to combine with D for low angular resolution studies ($\sim$3.5'' at 100GHz, $\sim$1.5'' at 230GHz) and with B for higher resolution ($\sim$2'' at 100GHz, $\sim$0.9'' at 230GHz). C alone is also well suited for snapshot and size measurement experiments.
• B in combination with A already provides slightly higher angular resolution ($\sim$1.5'' at 100GHz). Short baselines have been included to facilitate calibration (less decorrelation) and give some sensitivity to extended structure, although this is clearly not the primary goal of the AB configuration. It is mainly used for relatively strong sources.
• A alone is well suited for mapping or size measurements of very compact objects. It provides a resolution of 1.1'' at 100GHz, $\sim$0.5'' at 230GHz. In addition, because it contains long, intermediate and some short baselines, it could still be used in a tapered mode when a project is observed in marginal weather conditions despite some loss of sensitivity (for backup projects).

The four array configurations can be used in different combinations to improve on angular resolution and sensitivity. Mosaicing is usually done with D or CD, but the combination BCD can also be requested for high resolution mosaics. Enter ANY in the proposal form if the scientific goals can be reached with any of the four configurations or their subsets.

Please consult the documentation on the Plateau de Bure configurations for further details.

Receivers

All antennas are equipped with fully operational dual frequency receivers. The available frequency range will be 82 to 116 GHz for the 3mm band, and 205 to 245 GHz for the 1.3 mm band. The 3mm and 1.3mm receivers are aligned to within about 2''.

Below 105 GHz, receivers offer best performances in LSB tuning with high rejection (20 dB): expected system temperatures are 100 to 150 K for the winter time. Above 110 GHz, best performances are obtained with USB tuning, low rejection (4 to 6 dB): expected system temperatures are 250 K at 115 GHz.

The 1.3 mm receivers have DSB tuning with typical T $_{\rm REC}$ below 50 K. Expected SSB system temperature are 250 to 350 K. The guaranteed tuning range is 205-245 GHz, but it may be possible to reach some lower frequencies. Higher frequencies are not feasible on all antennas because of limitations in the triplers.

Signal to Noise

The rms noise can be computed from

$$\sigma = \frac{\mbox{$J_{\rm pK}$ }\mbox{$T_{\rm SYS}$ }} {\... ...{$N_{\rm a}$ }(\mbox{$N_{\rm a}$ }-1) \mbox{$N_{\rm c}$ }T B}}$$ (1)

where

• $T_{\rm SYS}$

  Coordinates and Velocities

  The interferometer operates in the J2000.0 system. For best positioning accuracy, source coordinates must be in the J2000.0 system; position errors up to 0.3'' may occur otherwise.

  Please do not forget to specify LSR velocities for the sources. For pure continuum projects, the ``special'' velocity NULL (no Doppler tracking) can be used.

  Coordinates and velocities in the proposal MUST BE CORRECT. A coordinate error is a potential cause for proposal rejection.

  Correlator

  The new correlator has 8 independent units, each being tunable anywhere in the 110-680 MHz band, and providing 7 different modes of configuration (characterized in the following by couples of total bandwidth/number of channels). In the 3 DSB modes (320MHz/128, 160MHz/256, 80MHz/512 - see Table) the two central channels may be perturbed by the Gibbs phenomenon depending on the continuum strength. When using these modes, it is recommended to avoid centering the most important part of the lines in the middle of the band of the correlator unit. In the remaining modes 160MHz/128, 80MHz/256, 40MHz/512, 20MHz/512) the two central channels are not affected by the Gibbs phenomenon and, therefore, these modes should be preferred for spectroscopic studies.

  Spacing	Channels	Bandwidth	Mode
  (MHz)		(MHz)
  0.039	$1 \times 512$	20	SSB
  0.078	$1 \times 512$	40	SSB
  0.156	$2 \times 256$	80	DSB
  0.312	$1 \times 256$	80	SSB
  0.625	$2 \times 128$	160	DSB
  1.250	$1 \times 128$	160	SSB
  2.500	$2 \times 64$	320	DSB

  Note that 5% of the passband are left out at the low-frequency and at the high frequency ends of each subband. The 8 units can be independently placed either on the 3mm or 1.3mm receiver.

  Sun Avoidance

  For safety reasons, the sun avoidance circle has been extended to 45 degrees. Please take this into account for your sources and the calibrators.

  Mosaics

  The PdBI has mosaicing capabilities, but the pointing accuracy may be a limiting factor at the highest frequencies. Please contact R. Neri in case of doubts.

  Data reduction

  Proposers should be aware of constraints for data reduction:
  • In general, data should be reduced in Grenoble. Proposers will not come for the observations, but may have to come for the reduction.
  • We keep the data reduction schedule very flexible, but wish to avoid the presence of more than 2 groups at the same time in Grenoble. Please contact us in advance.
  • In certain cases, proposers may have a look at the uv-tables as the observations progress. If necessary, and upon request, more information can be provided. Please contact us if you are interested in this.
  • CLIC is still evolving to cope with upgrades of the PdBI array. The newer versions are upward compatible with the previous releases, but the reverse is not true. Observers wanting to finish data reduction at their home institute should obtain the most recent version of CLIC. Because differences between CLIC versions may potentially result in imaging errors if new data are reduced with an old package, we insist that observers having a copy of CLIC take special care in maintaining it up-to-date.

  Data reduction will be carried out on the dedicated HP workstations.

  Local contact

  A local contact will be assigned to every A or B rated proposal which does not involve an in-house collaborator. He will assist you in the preparation of the observing procedures and provide help to reduce the data. Assistance is also provided before a deadline to help newcomers in the preparation of a proposal. Depending upon the programme complexity, IRAM may require an in-house collaborator instead of the normal local contact.

  Technical pre-screening

  All proposals will be reviewed for technical feasibility in addition to the scientific review by the programme committee. Please help in this task by submitting technically precise proposals. Note that your proposal must be complete and exact: the source position and velocity as well as the requested frequency setup must be correctly given.

  Non-standard observations

  If you plan to execute a non-standard program, please contact R.Neri or R.Lucas to discuss the feasibility.

  Documentation

  The documentation for the IRAM Plateau de Bure Interferometer (PdBI) includes documents of general interest to potential users:
  • An Introduction to the IRAM PdBI.
  • IRAM PdBI: Calibration CookBook.
  • IRAM PdBI: Mapping CookBook.
  • IRAM PdBI: Frequency Setup.
  • CLIC: Continuum and Line Interferometer Calibration.
  More specialized documents are also available; they are intended for observers on the site (IRAM on-duty astronomers, operators, or observers with non-standard programs):
  • IRAM PdBI: OBS Users Guide.
  • IRAM PdBI: Amplitude Calibration.
  • IRAM PdBI: Flux Measurements.
  • IRAM PdBI: Pointing Parameters.
  • IRAM PdBI: Trouble Shooting Guide.

  Finally, we would like to stress again the importance of the quality of the observing proposal. The IRAM interferometer is a powerful, but complex instrument, and proposal preparation requires special care. Information is available in the documentation and at http://iram.fr/PDBI/bure.html. The IRAM staff can help in case of doubts if contacted well before the deadline. Note that the proposal should not only justify the scientific interest, but also demonstrate how the Plateau de Bure interferometer will bring new information.
  
  

  Roberto NERI